Thursday 17 March 2022

how to atomically update values in a ConcurrentHashMap in Java using Compute and ComputeIfAbsent methods?

Hi,  ConcurrentHashMap is a thread-safe implementation of the Java Map interface, designed to be used in multi-threaded environments. It allows multiple threads to access and modify the map simultaneously without causing data corruption or race conditions.

One of the key features of ConcurrentHashMap is that it provides atomic operations to update its elements. Atomic operations are operations that are performed as a single, indivisible unit of work, which means they are guaranteed to be executed completely or not at all. This is important in multi-threaded environments where multiple threads may try to modify the same element at the same time.


The two methods in ConcurrentHashMap that are commonly used to atomically update values are compute and computeIfAbsent. The compute method takes a key and a lambda expression as arguments, and the lambda expression is used to update the value associated with the key. The computeIfAbsent method is similar to the compute method, but it first checks whether the key exists in the map, and if it does not, it inserts a new key-value pair with the default value provided by the lambda expression.

Both of these methods are atomic and thread-safe, and they allow multiple threads to update the same key-value pair simultaneously without causing any issues. It's important to note that the lambda expression provided to these methods should be side-effect-free to ensure that they are safe to use in a multi-threaded environment.

In Java, you can atomically update values in a ConcurrentHashMap using the Compute and ComputeIfAbsent methods. 

Here's an example of how to use these methods:

ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); // ComputeIfAbsent method example int newValue1 = map.computeIfAbsent("key", k -> 0); // if key not exist in map, then insert 0 as value for it. int updatedValue1 = map.computeIfAbsent("key", k -> 0) + 1; // if key exist in map, then increment its value by 1. System.out.println(newValue1); // prints 0 System.out.println(updatedValue1); // prints 1 // Compute method example int newValue2 = map.compute("key", (k, v) -> v == null ? 0 : v + 1); // if key not exist in map, then insert 0 as value for it. Otherwise, increment its value by 1. int updatedValue2 = map.compute("key", (k, v) -> v == null ? 0 : v + 1); // if key exist in map, then increment its value by 1. System.out.println(newValue2); // prints 0 System.out.println(updatedValue2); // prints 2



we first create a ConcurrentHashMap and use the computeIfAbsent method to insert a new key-value pair if the key does not already exist in the map, and then increment its value by 1 if it does. The compute method works in a similar way but also handles cases where the key already exists in the map.

Both compute and computeIfAbsent methods are atomic and thread-safe, which means that multiple threads can update the ConcurrentHashMap simultaneously without any issues.

It's worth noting that the lambda expression provided to computeIfAbsent or compute method should be side-effect-free, which means it should not have any unintended side-effects. If the lambda expression modifies some external state, it could cause unexpected behavior in a multi-threaded environment.

it's worth mentioning that the computeIfAbsent and compute methods return the new value of the key after it has been updated, which allows you to chain operations together as shown in the example.

Moreover, the computeIfAbsent method is particularly useful when you want to insert a new key-value pair in the ConcurrentHashMap with a default value, and then modify it atomically. In this case, the method ensures that the value is inserted atomically without the need for any additional synchronization mechanisms.

Lastly, it's important to note that while ConcurrentHashMap provides thread-safe access to its elements, it does not guarantee the atomicity of compound operations that rely on multiple element accesses. To ensure the atomicity of such operations, you may need to use additional synchronization mechanisms like locks or semaphores.

Here are three examples of how to atomically update values in a ConcurrentHashMap in Java using Compute and ComputeIfAbsent methods:

Example 1: Incrementing a value in the map

ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); map.put("key", 1); int result = map.compute("key", (k, v) -> v + 1); System.out.println(result); // prints 2



In above example, we first create a ConcurrentHashMap and insert a new key-value pair. Then, we use the compute method to atomically increment the value associated with the key "key" by 1. The result is stored in the result variable, and it is printed to the console.

Example 2: Inserting a new value in the map if key not exists

ConcurrentHashMap<String, String> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); String value = map.computeIfAbsent("key", k -> "default"); System.out.println(value); // prints "default"


 Here, we create a ConcurrentHashMap and use the computeIfAbsent method to insert a new key-value pair if the key "key" does not exist in the map. In this case, we provide a lambda expression that returns the default value "default". The method returns the new value associated with the key "key", which is stored in the value variable and printed to the console

Example 3: Using custom function to update value in the map

ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); map.put("key", 10); int result = map.compute("key", (k, v) -> v + 5); System.out.println(result); // prints 15


Same above example, we first create a ConcurrentHashMap and insert a new key-value pair. Then, we use the compute method to atomically update the value associated with the key "key". In this case, we provide a lambda expression that takes the key and the old value as arguments and returns the new value. The method returns the new value associated with the key "key", which is stored in the result variable and printed to the console. In this case, we added 5 to the existing value of 10, resulting in a new value of 15.


Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

<< Home